Marcantonio
Raimondi with Albrecht Dürer
In the Renaissance, many images were transferred or repeated into
different mediums: drawings would become paintings and paintings
would become tapestries, etc... The idea was that being able to have
more than one image of a piece of artwork was highly desirable, and
printmaking was the answer to that. Printmaking has an inherent
ability to produce thousands of editions. Marcantonio Raimondi's
engraving and woodcut publishing business made him a successful
artist. Giorgio Vasari's biography of Marcantonio labels him as the
central figure in Renaissance printmaking (Pon, 13). Marcantonio's
prints were widely collected by the late 1500's and highly valued
(Pon, 15).
Marcantonio Raimondi
worked in conjunction, or collaboration, with living artists like
Baccio Bandinelli when creating prints.
Marcantonio
and Baccio Bandinelli “ Martyrdom of St. Lawrence” engraving
(This piece was executed from Bandinell's drawing... a collaboration)
Possession and
collaboration was an issue in the printmaking world, “the concept
of practical collaboration allows us to explore the range of
relationships, from cases in which the printmaker knew and worked
next to the designer, to ones in which there was no personal
interaction at all [in creating the image]” (Pon, 12). Not much
information of printmaker Marcantonio Raimondi survives today, not
even the exact years of his birth and death (Pon, 10). No such legal
documentation of collaboration between Marcantonio and Raphael or
Dürer and Marcantonio have survived either (Pon, 12). What has
survived is the animosity Albrecht Dürer must have felt toward
Marcantonio Raimondi.
In the early 1500's Albrecht Dürer's prints were widely distributed
from his native roots in Germany, especially to Venice, Italy. In his
youth Marcantonio traveled to Venice and discovered the beautiful
woodcuts of Dürer. He spent almost all of the money he brought with
him in order to purchase the twenty print series of Dürer's called
“Life of the Virgin”. Albrecht Dürer had a large problem with
people copying and redistributing his artwork (especially the
Italians) without his consent. One of these offenders was Marcantonio
Raimondi when he made engravings “of the Nuremberg artist's Life
of the Virgin woodcuts” (Pon,
39). Dürer's Life of the Virgin series
of twenty woodcuts was, in a way, copyrighted. The Emperor of Rome,
Maximilian, had privileged Dürer “that no one shall dare to print
these works in spurious forms, nor sell such prints with the
boundaries of the Empire...” (Pon, 39).
Albrecht
Dürer, “Glorification of the Virgin” from “Life of the Virgin”
series Woodcut
Marcantonio after Albrecht Dürer
“Glorification of the Virgin” from “Life of the Virgin”
series Engraving
Marcantonio's copies, or plagiarized
versions, of the woodcuts were so skilled that many people thought
the engravings were made by Albrecht Dürer. This is partly because
Marcantonio did not remove Dürer's AD monogram,
or signature, from his own copies. When this situation was discovered
by Dürer he “was moved to such a fury that he left Flanders and
went to Venice, where he complained about Marcantonio to the Senate.
However, he got nothing but the sentence that Marcantonio could no
longer add the name or monogram of Albrecht Dürer to his works”
(Pon, 41).
Dürer's
AD monogram
Sometimes Marcantonio's engravings
still have the AD signature
as well as Marcantonio's own monogram. Marcantonio's monogram, or
signature is sometimes MA or MAF which stands for Marc'Antonio de'
Franci in honor of his teacher Francesco Francia (Pon, 15). Although
in other Marcantonio engravings of Dürer's work the AD
is completely removed.
It was surprising to learn such
lenient penalties for apparent plagiarism compared to current
punishments for stealing and reproducing artwork without consent in
the 21st
century. This treatment in the
1500's of artwork is because “these copies were produced in an
ambiance that did not always understand pictures as an artist's
property ”(Pon, 41). It is much later in the history of art that
these issues of copying and plagiarizing are more seriously
addressed.
Next time I will discuss the more
cordial relationship of High Renaissance artist Raphael with
Marcantonio Raimondi.
Bibliography:
Yale University Press, 2004. Print
P.S.
I just wanted to share with you all a quote from the book I am using.
As a MFA candidate in Printmaking this bitching from painter Titian
made be laugh:
“Titian complained
that certain men of little skill in art, in order to avoid hard work
and out of greed for money, have adopted this profession [of
printmaking], defrauding of honor the original author of said prints
by worsening them, stealing the labor of others, in addition to
swindling the public with forgeries of little value” (Pon, 48).
It is so interesting to see the problems arising with the brand new medium of printmaking. Titian considered prints based ON his paintings to be plagiarisms? One usually thought that he and Raphael were glad to have their art "published" widely through the new medium! (Of course Raimondi's prints of Durer's are plagiarisms!)
ReplyDelete